The U.S. intelligence community is becoming accused of a large intelligence failure, which led to the chaotic withdrawal of troops in Afghanistan. And now there is a concern of whether or not the dissolution of U.S. intelligence on the floor will make it simpler for the Taliban to go back on its pledge to keep al Qaeda and other terror teams out of Afghanistan.
If you’re on the lookout for an pro voice for your ongoing protection of the Afghanistan withdrawal, Syracuse University professor Kristen Patel is readily available for an interview. Patel, the Gregg Professor of Practice in Korean and East Asian Affairs in the Maxwell College of Citizenship and General public Affairs, specializes in intelligence and has extra than 25 years of encounter primary intelligence and analytics applications in the public and non-public sectors.
Patel has developed and managed quite a few huge groups of superior-accomplishing intelligence analysts concentrated on proactive intelligence and network evaluation, significantly qualitative and quantitative analysis of significant, transnational networks to determine a wide spectrum of monetary criminal offense and countrywide protection pitfalls.
Patel most not too long ago served as Regional Head of Analysis & Analytics in Asia-Pacific for HSBC, one of the world’s greatest banking companies, where her responsibilities bundled developing and handling a regional economic crime intelligence capability based mostly in Hong Kong. Prior to signing up for HSBC in 2017, Patel served as the deputy director of Intelligence at the Economic Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) in the U.S. Department of Treasury.
Patel has also served in a assortment of senior administration roles in Asia and Washington, D.C., at the DNI Open up Supply Heart (OSC) and Central Intelligence Company. In addition to serving as OSC Bureau Main in Seoul, South Korea, and running working day-to-working day functions in the CIA/Sherman Kent School’s most significant analytic program, she led U.S. federal government interagency initiatives similar to counterterrorism and proliferation difficulties and delivered day-to-day intelligence briefings for senior Countrywide Safety Council staff and White House advisors.
For use in your tales, here is what Patel says about the U.S. intelligence neighborhood and Afghanistan:
“Media reporting on the subject has been combined many stores are quoting former and latest U.S. governing administration and armed forces officers who are laying blame on other people, or earning comparisons to prior failures, such as the defective Iraq WMD (Weapons of Mass Destruction) evaluation by CIA analysts and the U.S. withdrawal in Vietnam.
“Ultimately, we will not know who is to blame with out figuring out what was briefed to policymakers and U.S. military leaders prior to the withdrawal. It is doable that both of those sides are remaining truthful from their level of watch the IC (intelligence group) and navy may perhaps have supplied strategic warnings and assessments to the administration and senior armed forces management, but the reports and examination had been not considered certain adequate to change class, or the sources made use of in the warnings may not have been credible or ended up discounted.
“Alternatively, the administration might have obtained unambiguous intelligence assessments and resolved to disregard them for policy good reasons, and/or it was ‘execution failure’ by the U.S. armed service. The only way for the public to know is to wait for the submit-mortem study to establish what went incorrect.”
Thank you for your thought. For far more details or to ask for an job interview with Professor Patel, you should call:
Media Relations Specialist
T 315.443.2990 M 315.254.9037